Add Mainnet Seed(mona.seed.fujishan.jp) #69
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Core-Wallets/monacoin!69
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "patch-1"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
私が運用しているMainnnetのDNS Seedを追加しました。
LGTM
But, can you add IPv6 addresses ?
Support IPv6 address!
@fujiwaraizuho great!!
@fujiwaraizuho Thank you for your suggestion. But It's gonna be hard to make a decision to me.
IMO, DNS seeds is a necessary evil. It should be minimum.
And as you know, we have two DNS seeds run by another persons already. I suppose it's enough redundant (for now).
The document will give us some helps. https://github.com/monacoinproject/monacoin/blob/master-0.17/doc/dnsseed-policy.md
@fujiwaraizuho I believe you are a active developer. Next. Do you believe you must be a DNSseed operator?
@cryptcoin-junkey
I don't think there is enough redundancy True, DNS seeds pose a risk to the network, but are what monacoind needs to connect to the network.
Currently, DNS Seed is run by @tcejorpniocanom and @wakiyamap, but only one operator is open to the community.
This PR was released 8 days ago, but @tcejorpniocanom is not participating in the discussion.
I must agree to Monacoin's DNS policy and be a DNS seed operator.
@fujiwaraizuho You may know Hodoyoshi-reliability engineering. There is a reasonable cost-merit point on every system. The network of Monacoin nodes also.
AFAIK, two DNS seeds are working fine now. My opinion is "Don't touch anything that goes well."
@cryptcoin-junkey
Currently registered DNS Seeds support IPv6 only for DNS seeds operated by @wakiyamap.
When IPv4 is exhausted and IPv6 becomes widespread and IPv6 access to DNS Seed increases, we think that one DNS Seed is not redundant.
I will run dnsseed as long as I can do my best.
But I can't deny that Mr.Watanabe and my dnsseed could be down at the same time.
It is my opinion that "more choices are better".
@fujiwaraizuho Surely someday IPv4 will be dead. But when? Tomorrow? In this year?
@wakiyamap Okay it's enough possible two DNS seeds are down at the same time.
Then, why can we expect mona.seed.fujishan.jp is up?
We must do a optimal design if we want to get redundancy.
As everybody knows, all reviewers on this PR can merge this PR.
Just I exposed my thoughts because it is a kind of Dev's duty.
Obviously, it's not "justice". Just my opinion.
Reviewers can push "Merge pull request" button always.
And, it's also just my additional opinion.
How about shortly (~ a year?) suspending to merge this PR ?
I have no strong objection that the new DNS seed runs with Monad.
(Strictly, I can say no objection as I'm not a dev of Monad. :-)
And this PR will be acceptable there since the code owner of Monad @wakiyamap approved this PR.
For monad(neutrino), it is necessary to connect to the node having compactfilter.
So if there is not much dnsseed, it may not be possible to connect to the monad(neutrino) node.
But we may not have to rush about monacoind.
I close it once.
We decide in the next version.
@fujiwaraizuho I use it for monad. Thanks!!
Pull request closed